怡居地產

加入怡居

過去7年，我司每年平均捐出52%純利作慈善用途，款額動輒以百萬元計，可稱實至名歸的社會企業。閣下光顧我司，是變相自己做善事！日後請多多光顧為感！

尖沙咀總行 : 2569 2192

太古城華山分行 : 2569 1339

沙田銀禧分行 : 2636 1380

太古城明宮分行 : 2560 3738

沙田第一城專責組 : 2647 1838

杏花邨專責組 : 2898 0007

尖沙咀總行 : 2569 2192

太古城華山分行 : 2569 1339

沙田第一城專責組 : 2647 1838

沙田銀禧分行 : 2636 1380

太古城明宮分行 : 2560 3738

杏花邨專責組 : 2898 0007

回應 : 0

法律隨筆

用胸襲警

標少

2015年7月20日

在非禮案的受害者一文讀者留下這留言：

匿名2015年7月17日下午6:15

What do you think about P K Chan's Verdict? A woman assaulting the police with her breast (do you know of any woman on Earth who would assault a police officer with her breast)? Even Time Magazine reported the joke.

http://time.com/3962142/hong-kong-woman-police-breast-assault/?xid=fbshare

A Hong Kong Woman Just Got Convicted of Assaulting a Police Officer With Her Breast

一The extent of the officer's physical injuries was not revealed

A court in Hong Kong Kong convicted 30-year-old Ng Lai-ying Thursday of assaulting a police officer by hitting him with her breast during a protest on March 1.

Ng testified that during the protest the officer had reached out his arm to grasp the strap of her bag and that his hand had come in contact with her upper left breast, the South China Morning Post reports.

She told the court that she immediately yelled, “Indecent assault!”

But in his decision, the magistrate rejected those allegations, accusing Ng of lying in her testimony and instead finding her guilty of using her breast to bump the officer’s arm. “You used your female identity to trump up the allegation that the officer had molested you. This is a malicious act,” he said.

There was no word on what physical injuries, if any, the officer suffered.

時代的著眼點是女被告的講法和法庭沒有描述警察的傷勢，語帶諷刺。那不是法律討論，諷剌文章不難寫，寫出來有沒有見地就各自表述好了。不過，誰説Assaulting A Police Officer需要physical injuries?這不是Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm，actual bodily harm並非控罪元素。如果對諷刺看得過癮，請繼續過你的癮，悉隨尊便。我也回覆了留言的一個問題：(do you know of any woman on Earth who would assault a police officer with her breast)?我憑印象答了「林依麗」案。趁未赴晚宴前找了這件案出來，這名女人的案是這一宗：香港特別行政區訴林依麗 HCMA 705/2010。有別於胸襲警察，林依麗指控保安員非禮。你當然可以説distinguishable，我只想指出女性胸部也可以是武器，不論惡性或良性，也足以致命。

原審裁判官陳碧橋審訊此案，所作的裁決基本上屬事實裁斷，我不置喙。如果你前設的想法是女人一定只被胸襲，而無可能以胸襲人，我不跟你爭拗，這種爭拗毫無意義。為事實作裁斷的人，自然會依據他接納的事實作出決定。根據制度，只有上訴法院才有權去重新審視。

留言者繼而問我:I wonder if the decision would be different if the magistrate is a female. 這問題不難答，也不好答，因為法官不論男女都應有公正裁決，但一件案審結了，除非找個女官來重審，否則也不會看到另一番結果。就算由女官來審，結果一樣，也可以有别的wonders。我湊巧答了這問題，但最後刪除了，都怪瘋狗Maro，他看了我的回覆就瘋罵，由裁判法院罵到終審法院。他已瘋到這程度，我只好不論好歹把他新的留言都刪除了。我講明會刪他的留言，他還厚著臉皮，刪完再留。他早幾天另一則留言給我刪了，他說控辯雙方都代表過，只是沒做過法官。我保留著他的留言，他朝有日他做了法官，我一定會送個花牌給他做賀禮，貼上這些刪掉的留言，再標以「狗官」賀他。當然，他要發春秋大夢才能當上狗官。